- #X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate skin
- #X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate full
- #X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate software
- #X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate series
In my opinion, it created the most visually pleasing image by default, even if if color accuracy wasn't perfect. In this comparison, I feel Lightroom is the clear loser. Both Capture One Pro 9 and Lightroom were much closer to the true color of the object photographed.Īs a whole, I'm quite pleased with Photo RAW 2017's raw processing. Photo RAW 2017's accuracy seemed to struggle, however, within the context of more saturated colors such as the knife handle, which appears to have a rich orange that is closer to red than the others, which does not reflect how the knife handle appears in real life. I was surprised to see the degree in which Capture One Pro 9 added a slight red cast to those same tones. Photo RAW 2017 also seemed to handle color accuracy within mid- to low-saturation areas very well. The image enjoys somewhat less contrast than the image processed with Capture One Pro 9, but without sacrificing color quality as is clear with the Lightroom image which felt somewhat washed out to me. In terms of dynamic range, I was quite pleased by Photo RAW 2017.
#X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate full
The images were loaded directly from the Nikon raw files and exported at full resolution without any adjustments. The images below were processed in their respective applications with no additional alterations. I wouldn't ever use it for commercial work, but I could see it coming in handy for work such as wedding photos.Īs for raw processing quality, I wanted to compare Photo RAW 2017 to the two other industry-leading raw processors, Capture One Pro 9 (which was actually recently updated to version 10) and Lightroom.
#X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate skin
Photo RAW 2017 also included a panel for automated skin retouching that seemed to work decently well for me. One nifty option that I did quite enjoy was a simple checkbox below the vibrance slider that allowed the user to reduce the impact of a vibrance adjustment on skin tones. Photo RAW 2017, however, appears to lack any of the more advanced features such as lens profile corrections or a tool to fix chromatic aberration. The standard controls that have become fairly expected within raw processors are all present. In terms of raw processing features, Photo RAW 2017 aims for a fairly simplistic approach similar to that in Lightroom. There is no shortage of raw processors on the market to place a fairly high bar on Photo RAW 2017.
#X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate software
The develop module is what I'd consider to be the most important aspect of Photo RAW 2017 and is what would ultimately decide whether this software would make it into my own personal workflow. It is really the only thing left in which I feel Lightroom still remains a leading force. Personally, I still prefer the Lightroom workflow.
As a whole I found that the feature delivered on what its goal was, and it is likely that many users will be quite happy with it. The workflow is designed to be quicker and less cumbersome than Lightroom, but this comes at the cost of being less concise. The user simply browses through his or her own file system to organize and manage photos.
Unlike Lightroom, Photo RAW 2017's file management module does not depend on any sort of importing.
Photo RAW 2017 is touting the browse module as an alternative to Lightroom's organizational structure. This review is not meant to be comprehensive, as it is only based upon a few hours of use. This review will cover each in succession to evaluate them on their own merits and shortcomings.
#X rite colorchecker passport qimage ultimate series
As with Lightroom, Photo RAW 2017 is broken down into a series of modules designed to work together or independently within your workflow.
0 kommentar(er)
